blob: 986ac0bac9eb5e4744dde63b2a224deefcc5bb86 (
plain)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
|
<!DOCTYPE html>
<html lang="en">
<head>
<meta charset="UTF-8">
<meta http-equiv="X-UA-Compatible" content="IE=edge" />
<meta name="viewport" content="width=device-width, initial-scale=1.0" />
<meta name="description" content="My personal website.">
<meta name="author" content="Preston Pan">
<link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="/css/style.css" />
<link rel="icon" type="image/png" href="/img/favicon.png">
<title>
Philosophy
</title>
</head>
<body>
<div class="nav" class="justcenter">
<a href="/index.html" class="justleft">Home</a> |
<a href="/about/" class="justleft">About</a> |
<a href="/about/contact.html" class="justleft">Contact</a>
<!--BACKDIR-->
<hr>
</div>
<div class="content">
<h1>Philosophy</h1>
<p>
I'm mostly an antiphilosopher. At least, in the way that most people approach philosophy.
I maintain that there is no such logical system that binds morality, there is no such
logical system that binds epistemology, and that there is no logical system that binds
metaphysics. I believe postmodern thought can lead to interesting conclusions (even
though many seem to think that it cannot). Yes, I am aware that postmodernism can
deconstruct itself, and I do that regularly. Here are some articles from this perspective.
</p>
<h2>Topics</h2>
<ul>
<li><a href="./antimorality.pdf">Antimorality</a> -- the case against logical morality.</li>
<li><a href="./antiepistemology.pdf">Antiepistemology</a> -- the case against systematic epistemology.</li>
<li><a href="./antimetaphysics.pdf">Antimetaphysics</a> -- the case against any metaphysical claims other than the fact that you exist or the present moment exists.</li>
<li><a href="./source/">Source documents</a> -- Source groff ms documents for the articles above.</li>
</ul>
</div>
</body>
</html>
|
