1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
|
<!DOCTYPE html>
<html lang="en">
<head>
<meta charset="UTF-8">
<meta http-equiv="X-UA-Compatible" content="IE=edge" />
<meta name="viewport" content="width=device-width, initial-scale=1.0" />
<meta name="description" content="My personal website.">
<meta name="author" content="Preston Pan">
<link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="/css/style.css" />
<link rel="icon" type="image/png" href="/img/favicon.png">
<title>
About
</title>
</head>
<body>
<div class="nav" class="justcenter">
<a href="/index.html" class="justleft">Home</a> |
<a href="/about/" class="justleft">About</a> |
<a href="/about/contact.html" class="justleft">Contact</a>
| <a href="./index.html">Back</a>
<hr>
</div>
<div class="content">
<h1>About Technology</h1>
<p>
This article is about the technology that I use, both in software and in hardware.
</p>
<h2>Computer Hardware</h2>
<p>
I personally use a thinkpad X200 which is librebooted and a thinkpad X230, which has
the default vendor BIOS. I use old thinkpads because:
</p>
<ul>
<li>They are reliable and well built.</li>
<li>They were made to be repaired, unlike other modern hardware.</li>
<li>They are affordable.</li>
<li>They have a nice keyboard (at least the X200 does) and they have the red dot (which is better than a mouse in many cases).</li>
<li>They are upgradable to a large extent.</li>
</ul>
<p>
Also, the feeling of using a thinkpad is just quite nice. There is no real other way to
describe it, you just have to try it yourself.
</p>
<h3>Antiphone</h3>
<p>
I don't have a phone. Actually, that is a lie. I do have one, but almost never use it.
They are not useful to me and I don't use conventional social media so I have no need
for them. Computers are much better at making software and articles, and also computers
can more easily run open source software (not that it matters inherently but to me
most open source software is just better because I can basically do what I want with
my computer). It doesn't feel like you own a phone when you buy one; someone else owns
the phone, and you buy the rights to use it. With most computers, the general feeling
is that you own it.
</p>
<h2>Software</h2>
<p>
I try to use minimal software where I can. The general philosophy is one of the UNIX
philosophy; you have simple components and you make them do complex things via piping
and whatnot.
</p>
<h3>Operating systems</h3>
<p>
I would consider using and have used these operating systems:
</p>
<ul>
<li>Void gnu/linux -- it's quite minimal and has a good package manager.</li>
<li>Arch gnu/linux -- the same as void, except a little less minimal.</li>
<li>Trisquel gnu/linux -- an operating system that is actually 100% free software. I run this currently on my X200.</li>
<li>OpenBSD -- The operating system I run on my X230 currently. Does things correct for the most part and more UNIX.</li>
<li>9front -- Yes, I've actually run this before for a little bit. Really liked it, but no modern web browser. Would run again though.</li>
</ul>
<p>
I would recommend all of these to try out. They all have their unique upsides and downsides, though you could probably
get all linux distros to work in almost the same way if you wanted to. If you're looking for something new (and better
designed than linux in my opinion) you could try OpenBSD and 9front.
</p>
<h4>Systemd</h4>
<p>
It doesn't actually matter if your distro uses it or not.
</p>
<h3>Userland</h3>
<p>
I tend to use <a href="https://suckless.org">suckless</a> userland programs because they tend to follow the UNIX
philosophy and their software is just better than the competition. For example, dwm can do swallowing, and I
have not encountered any other window manager that will do that natively (you might need a program to do it for
you). The st terminal supports everything as long as you add patches, but even if you don't, it's still better
than most other terminal emulators that want to do too much. The dmenu program is just good because you can
make custom scripts and that increases the usability of your computer like five-fold.
</p>
<p>
Also see their rocks/ page for most of the software that I use. You can also see
<a href="/projects/dotfiles.html">my dotfiles</a> for the software that I use.
</p>
<p>
For OpenBSD, I mostly use cwm with the defaults and most of the same programs I use for gnu/linux. For 9front,
I use the base system mostly (obviously).
</p>
</div>
</body>
</html>
|
