diff options
Diffstat (limited to 'build/website/about/technology.html')
| -rw-r--r-- | build/website/about/technology.html | 109 |
1 files changed, 109 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/build/website/about/technology.html b/build/website/about/technology.html new file mode 100644 index 0000000..ad9fce3 --- /dev/null +++ b/build/website/about/technology.html @@ -0,0 +1,109 @@ +<!DOCTYPE html> +<html lang="en"> +<head> + <meta charset="UTF-8"> + <meta http-equiv="X-UA-Compatible" content="IE=edge" /> + <meta name="viewport" content="width=device-width, initial-scale=1.0" /> + <meta name="description" content="My personal website."> + <meta name="author" content="Preston Pan"> + <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="/css/style.css" /> + + <link rel="icon" type="image/png" href="/img/favicon.png"> + <title> +About + </title> +</head> +<body> + <div class="nav" class="justcenter"> + <a href="/index.html" class="justleft">Home</a> | + <a href="/about/" class="justleft">About</a> | + <a href="/about/contact.html" class="justleft">Contact</a> + <!--BACKDIR--> + <hr> + </div> + + <div class="content"> +<h1>About Technology</h1> +<p> + This article is about the technology that I use, both in software and in hardware. +</p> + +<h2>Computer Hardware</h2> +<p> + I personally use a thinkpad X200 which is librebooted and a thinkpad X230, which has + the default vendor BIOS. I use old thinkpads because: +</p> +<ul> + <li>They are reliable and well built.</li> + <li>They were made to be repaired, unlike other modern hardware.</li> + <li>They are affordable.</li> + <li>They have a nice keyboard (at least the X200 does) and they have the red dot (which is better than a mouse in many cases).</li> + <li>They are upgradable to a large extent.</li> +</ul> +<p> + Also, the feeling of using a thinkpad is just quite nice. There is no real other way to + describe it, you just have to try it yourself. +</p> + +<h3>Antiphone</h3> +<p> + I don't have a phone. Actually, that is a lie. I do have one, but almost never use it. + They are not useful to me and I don't use conventional social media so I have no need + for them. Computers are much better at making software and articles, and also computers + can more easily run open source software (not that it matters inherently but to me + most open source software is just better because I can basically do what I want with + my computer). It doesn't feel like you own a phone when you buy one; someone else owns + the phone, and you buy the rights to use it. With most computers, the general feeling + is that you own it. +</p> + +<h2>Software</h2> +<p> + I try to use minimal software where I can. The general philosophy is one of the UNIX + philosophy; you have simple components and you make them do complex things via piping + and whatnot. +</p> + +<h3>Operating systems</h3> +<p> + I would consider using and have used these operating systems: +</p> +<ul> + <li>Void gnu/linux -- it's quite minimal and has a good package manager.</li> + <li>Arch gnu/linux -- the same as void, except a little less minimal.</li> + <li>Trisquel gnu/linux -- an operating system that is actually 100% free software. I run this currently on my X200.</li> + <li>OpenBSD -- The operating system I run on my X230 currently. Does things correct for the most part and more UNIX.</li> + <li>9front -- Yes, I've actually run this before for a little bit. Really liked it, but no modern web browser. Would run again though.</li> +</ul> +<p> + I would recommend all of these to try out. They all have their unique upsides and downsides, though you could probably + get all linux distros to work in almost the same way if you wanted to. If you're looking for something new (and better + designed than linux in my opinion) you could try OpenBSD and 9front. +</p> + +<h4>Systemd</h4> +<p> + It doesn't actually matter if your distro uses it or not. +</p> + +<h3>Userland</h3> +<p> + I tend to use <a href="https://suckless.org">suckless</a> userland programs because they tend to follow the UNIX + philosophy and their software is just better than the competition. For example, dwm can do swallowing, and I + have not encountered any other window manager that will do that natively (you might need a program to do it for + you). The st terminal supports everything as long as you add patches, but even if you don't, it's still better + than most other terminal emulators that want to do too much. The dmenu program is just good because you can + make custom scripts and that increases the usability of your computer like five-fold. +</p> +<p> + Also see their rocks/ page for most of the software that I use. You can also see + <a href="/projects/dotfiles.html">my dotfiles</a> for the software that I use. +</p> +<p> + For OpenBSD, I mostly use cwm with the defaults and most of the same programs I use for gnu/linux. For 9front, + I use the base system mostly (obviously). +</p> + + </div> +</body> +</html> |