summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/website/philosophy
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorPreston Pan <preston@nullring.xyz>2022-11-08 10:28:58 -0800
committerPreston Pan <preston@nullring.xyz>2022-11-08 10:28:58 -0800
commitdc2fd65e6bfeaa2c475d5042f64263ac9427c22f (patch)
tree3f680c74d831c984048080e0ff7d86fb7c5f1f05 /website/philosophy
completely changed backend
Diffstat (limited to 'website/philosophy')
-rw-r--r--website/philosophy/index.html24
1 files changed, 24 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/website/philosophy/index.html b/website/philosophy/index.html
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..49f89e8
--- /dev/null
+++ b/website/philosophy/index.html
@@ -0,0 +1,24 @@
+$$START TITLE
+Philosophy
+$$END TITLE
+
+$$START CONTENT
+<h1>Philosophy</h1>
+<p>
+ I'm mostly an antiphilosopher. At least, in the way that most people approach philosophy.
+ I maintain that there is no such logical system that binds morality, there is no such
+ logical system that binds epistemology, and that there is no logical system that binds
+ metaphysics. I believe postmodern thought can lead to interesting conclusions (even
+ though many seem to think that it cannot). Yes, I am aware that postmodernism can
+ deconstruct itself, and I do that regularly. Here are some articles from this perspective.
+</p>
+
+<h2>Topics</h2>
+<ul>
+ <li><a href="./antimorality.pdf">Antimorality</a> -- the case against logical morality.</li>
+ <li><a href="./antiepistemology.pdf">Antiepistemology</a> -- the case against systematic epistemology.</li>
+ <li><a href="./antimetaphysics.pdf">Antimetaphysics</a> -- the case against any metaphysical claims other than the fact that you exist or the present moment exists.</li>
+ <li><a href="./source/">Source documents</a> -- Source groff ms documents for the articles above.</li>
+</ul>
+
+$$END CONTENT